I’ve toyed with the CLR in SQL Sever 2005 off and on since the first Yukon beta had it enabled. And I’ll be honest with you, I was not a fan.It wasn’t like “YOU got chocolate in my peanut butter!” kind of moment for me. I really thought it was going to be a disaster of biblical proportions. As SQL Server DBA’s we caught a break, adoption wasn’t exactly stellar. The problem was there are enough restrictions and little gotchas to keep developers from whole sale abandoning Transact SQL for something more familiar. Fast forward a few years and now I’m not so scared.My biggest worry back then was memory usage. I’m still not very comfortable with it, but on a 64-bit platform you can mitigate those issues by adding more memory. On a 32-bit platform you could cause all kinds of damage by squeezing the lower 4GB memory space to the point you could have connection and backup failures due to lack of memory. Oh and the fix is usually restarting SQL Server. An example of this comes directly from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131075.aspx
Scalable Memory Usage
In order for managed garbage collection to perform and scale well in SQL Server, avoid large, single allocation. Allocations greater than 88 kilobytes (KB) in size will be placed on the Large Object Heap, which will cause garbage collection to perform and scale much worse than many smaller allocations. For example, if you need to allocate a large multi-dimensional array, it is better to allocate a jagged (scattered) array.
This memory thing is serious.
The other biggie is what you can, or cannot do using the CLR.
Again from MSDN http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms131047.aspx
SAFE is the most reliable and secure mode with associated restrictions in terms of the allowed programming model. SAFE assemblies are given enough permission to run, perform computations, and have access to the local database. SAFE assemblies need to be verifiably type safe and are not allowed to call unmanaged code.
UNSAFE is for highly trusted code that can only be created by database administrators. This trusted code has no code access security restrictions, and it can call unmanaged (native) code.
EXTERNAL_ACCESS provides an intermediate security option, allowing code to access resources external to the database but still having the reliability guarantees of SAFE.
Most restrictive to least restrictive permissions. Something you don’t worry about in general as a C# programmer but in the database its always an issue in some way.
What it boils down to:
If you are just talking to SQL Server using basic C# stuff leave it in SAFE which is the default.
If you need access to the file system or the registry and some other limited stuff EXTERNAL_ACCESS is the way to go.
IF you want to have the ability to completely tank a production SQL Server UNSAFE puts it all into your hands. You can call unmanaged code via P/Invoke, all bets are off.
Some additional light reading on what libraries can and can’t be called in the CLR.
Fun stuff, no Finalizers or static fields, read-only static fields are ok though. You will see why this is important to me a little later on.
T-SQL vs. CLR
The other thing I had been promoting, and not always correctly, is putting complicated math functions in CLR. Generally, I’ve found that most math problems run faster in the CLR over native T-SQL. And I’ve found for the most part that holds true for the core algorithm. Once you add data retrieval into the mix things shift back in T-SQL’s favor for a lot of operations. Like everything else, test your ideas using real world scenarios or as close as you can before deciding on one technology over another. I prime example for me was coding up Pythagorean and Haversine equations for the classic distance between two zip codes in T-SQL and C# via CLR. Running test data through an array in the C# solution it ran rings around the T-SQL function I had coded up but once it had to start pulling and pushing data back to the database the T-SQL solution was the clear winner.
Another aspect where the CLR can be much better is string manipulation. I’ve written a couple of small UDF’s to handle some of this since using the LIKE ‘%’ would cause a table scan anyway the CLR UDF was faster internally when dealing with the string than T-SQL was using all the string handling functions.
I’m also seeing quite a bit on using the CLR for rolling aggregates and other kinds of aggregation problems. I don’t have any personal experience in that yet with the CLR.
There are also some things that aren’t practical at all using T-SQL, some would say you shouldn’t be using the database for some of this stuff in the first place but that is an argument for a different post.
And Now for Something Completely Different…
I’ve recently started working on my most complex project using the CLR, some aspects have been covered by other folks like Adam Machanic, Robin Dewson and Jonathan Kehayias but there was some specific requirements that I needed.
Thus was born….
This is a codeplex hosted project and all the source code is available there for your viewing pleasure.
I’ve done a lot of C# stuff but this was my first hard core CLR app for SQL Server.
What the assembly does is pretty simple, store files in the database ether native, encrypted or compressed.Yoel Martinez wrote up a nice UDF that does blob compression using the CLR. Between this and examples in Pro SQL Server 2005 on storing files in the database I knew I could do what I needed to do.
The wrinkle in my project was not just reading the file and storing it compressed it was putting it back on disk compressed as well. Enter #ziplib (SharpZipLib). This library allows you to pretty easily create standard zip files that even Windows Explorer can open and extract from. So with all the bits in place I set out to build my little tool.
The first thing I did was put together all the samples I’d found build them up as a set of stored procedures instead of UDF’s and just got the file in and out working. Next I added compression via C#’s DeflateStream to see what it would take to get the data flowing in and out and what the performance hit in memory and time would start looking like. At this point I was pretty optimistic I could knock this thing out in a day or two tops. That was all fine and dandy until I started integrating the #ziplib library. My initial goal was to have the assembly set to EXTERNAL_ACCESS since that was the most restrictive security model.
Since the guys that wrote #ziplib didn’t have the CLR in mind there are several things that break without UNSAFE set. As I mentioned earlier the use of finalizers and static fields were the two big ones. I will at some point recode those parts but for now they are still in place. The second thing is the library covers a lot more functionality that I actually need, So I’ve removed the bits I can without refactoring the library. The resulting DLL isn’t horribly big at this point but I figure when I get around to coding up the finalizers I’ll refactor down to what I need then. One big plus for me though is #ziplib is all managed code written in C# so it is pretty easily added directly into my DLL so I don’t have to register two assemblies or call down to the file system to a unmanaged DLL. Compression is handled by RijndaelManaged which is a built in .net 2.0 libraries.
The big downer for me was trying to debug the the code in Visual Studio 2008, when it did work it was ok but It would fail to connect or fail to register the assemblies so I just fell back to injecting debug messages and running tests manually in SSMS.
One thing I really like about programming languages like C# is method overloading, I really wished you could do that with stored procedures! Since I can’t there were only two options, a stored proc that had lots of flags and variables that may or may not be used and handle it all under the covers or just build each option into a proc with simple callers and a descriptive name. I voted for option two. Some of the T-SQL procedures are used internally by the CLR procedures while all the CLR procedures are called by the user.
Here is the list procedures and what they do.
Called by CLR procedures as helpers
Is called by every proc that inserts a file into the database.
Called by StorePassPhrase to handle insert into database.
Called by any proc that has to decrypt a file stream
Called by any proc that retrieves a file from the database
Called by Users
Called by User supplying a file id and list of key words or “tags” as a search helper other than file name.
Get details on a single file or every file stored in the database.
Give it a password and it generates a secure hash stored into the database for symmetric encryption
Below all store a file from the file system into the database.
Below all retrieve a file from the database back to the file system.
Below all retrieve a file from the database but returns a record set with the file name and the BLOB data.
And lastly, I put in an xp_getfiledetails clone since I wanted a way to verify the file is on disk and get attributes it seemed pretty straight forward since I’m getting the same details when i write the file to the database anyway.
This project isn’t done yet. there are a few more things to be added other than the code cleanup I mentioned already.
Off line decryption tool so the files dumped to disk still encrypted can be worked with.
Additional stored procedures for searching for files by tag or by attributes like name, size, etc.
A real installer and not a zip file with T-SQL scripts.
After that it goes into maintained mode with no new features but work on speeding it up, reducing the memory impact and fixing any bugs that are found. I really want to avoid this growing into a huge library, Keep it simple, do one thing and do it well.
Here are some things that helped me along the way.
Visual Studio 2008
could have used notepad but hey I’m getting lazy in my old age.
JetBrains ReSharper 4.5
If you are using Visual Studio ReSharper is a must. I feel like I’m programming the the stone age without it.
Free tool to help you document your C# code using XMLDoc. Yet something else I wished I could do with stored procedures
If you are building documentation and have XMLDoc in your code this can make it easier to gather it all together. It isn’t perfect but it is free.
Both solid text Pro SQL Server 2005 has a chapter on CLR
|Pro SQL Server 2005|
This one is dedicated to just CLR and was also invaluable to me.
|Pro SQL Server 2005 Assemblies|
On The Web
Devoted to the CLR with some nice resources.
My Twitter buddies are always there to answer a question or two!
Until next time!